Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 28 April 2022

Testing the Relative Comprehensiveness of Schwartz’s Ten Value Types with Help from Rokeach

Jacques de Wet1, Daniela Wetzelhütter2, Chigozie Nnebedum3 & Johann Bacher4

Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp. 107–125 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2022.107.125

8,029 accesses5,412 downloads3 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

The universality of Schwartz’s Theory of Basic Human Values relies on the comprehensiveness of his value types, i.e., they are exhaustive of all human values, no matter where they are found. Schwartz built on Rokeach's (1973) theory of human values, however, by 1994 Schwartz had developed a theory of values that superseded Rokeach's 36 values with ten value types. Drawing on Rokeach, we tested the comprehensiveness of Schwartz's theory by statistically assessing the extent to which Schwartz's model of ten-value types and their underlying structural dimensions incorporate all of Rokeach's 36 values. We performed factor analyses on data collected from Austria, Nigeria, and South Africa with Rokeach's Values Survey Instrument and Schwartz's 21- item Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ-21). Our results show that while Schwartz’s theoretical model, measured with the PVQ-21, approaches comprehensiveness, it falls short because it does not statistically accommodate six of Rokeach’s values. However, longer questionnaires based on the same core theory, especially the 56-item Schwartz Value Survey (SVS), contain these six Rokeach values. Were we to repeat our experiment using the SVS, or one of the other longer versions of the PVQ, we would likely find that all of Rokeach’s values are accommodated in Schwartz’s theory.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

de Wet, J., Wetzelhütter, D., Nnebedum, C. & Bacher, J. (2022). Testing the Relative Comprehensiveness of Schwartz’s Ten Value Types with Help from Rokeach. Journal of Social Sciences, 18(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2022.107.125

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 18, Issue 1
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Testing the Relative Comprehensiveness of Schwartz’s Ten Value Types with Help from RokeachJournal of Social Sciences · Volume 18, Issue 1 · pp. 107–125 · CC BY 4.0Download