Guide for editors
Handling a manuscript from assignment to decision, and the standards we hold each other to.
- Step 1Accept the assignmentWithin 5 days; never your own manuscript
- Step 2Invite reviewersAt least three, in small batches
- Step 3Run the reviewThe manuscript and the quality of the reports
- Step 4DecideAt least two reviews; then within 7 days
Accept the assignment
You handle the peer review of a manuscript in your field: you choose the reviewers, watch the quality of their reports and give the authors a decision with reasons. The office handles the administration with you and answers your questions within two working days.
Accept or decline within 5 days. If you have a competing interest with the authors, decline and say so; the office reassigns the manuscript. You never handle a manuscript you wrote: another editor does, and you see it only as its author. A waiver for your own submission is decided case by case by the publisher, as for anyone. A guest editor may publish at most one paper of their own in their special issue, handled by another editor.
Editorial independenceInvite reviewers
Run the review
- Is the work original?
- Is the research question important?
- Are there ethical concerns?
- Is earlier research properly acknowledged?
Reminders go to reviewers automatically. Read each report as it arrives and approve it on the Decision page; the reviewer’s certificate is issued on approval. If one is thin or rude, do not pass it on: ask for a replacement and rate the report. A report you have not approved within 3 days may be approved by the office.
Review is single-anonymised: reviewers know who the authors are. Reviewers’ names are never shown to authors. Keep them out of every message.
Decide
A decision needs at least two completed reviews; nobody records a decision before then. It follows within 7 days of the last review. Base it on the reviews and your own reading. The letter should cover:
- scientific inconsistencies;
- weaknesses in the methods;
- the importance of the topic;
- language problems;
- the quality and accuracy of figures and tables;
- how to improve the manuscript.
You answer for the decision and send the letter with the reports. Once the reviews are in, you may reject a manuscript whose originality, clarity or relevance to the journal is in doubt. If you think it should not have passed screening, tell the office instead of inviting reviewers: the office checks each new manuscript against criteria your editor-in-chief sets, and only the office rejects at screening.