Guide for authors
Everything from choosing a journal to what happens after publication, in the order you will need it.
- Step 1Choose a journalScope, charges and measured times
- Step 2Prepare the manuscriptAny format first; the parts in order
- Step 3DeclareConflicts, funding, data, ethics, AI
- Step 4Submit through My SciPubSix steps; save and finish later
- Step 5Peer reviewScreening, reviewers, the decision
- Step 6After acceptanceInvoice, payment, proof, publication
Choose a journal
Each journal’s page gives its scope, its charge and its measured times. Not sure which fits? The journal finder matches your title and abstract to our journals.
Prepare the manuscript
Write in clear, concise English and ask a colleague to read the paper before you submit. Any format is fine for the first submission; the templates help after acceptance.
1Title pageThe title, every author’s name and address, and the corresponding author’s email and phone.
This should contain the title of the contribution and the names and addresses of the authors. The full postal address, e-mail address, telephone and facsimile number of the author who will receive correspondence and check the proofs should be included.
2Running headA short title, shown on the journal’s pages.
The running head or short title is the shortened version of your manuscript title. Not only does this help identifying your manuscript during the evaluation process, it also acts as the manuscript title on the journal homepage providing information at a glance for people who are reading the journal.
3AbstractUp to 300 words: scope, rationale and main findings; no references or equations.
All manuscripts must include a brief but informative Abstract. It should not exceed 300 words and should describe the scope, hypothesis or rationale for the work and the main findings. The abstract should allow the reader to quickly have a clear idea about the rational for the work, the experiments conducted and the results of those experiments before reading the rest of the manuscript. Both common and scientific names should be included; the authorities are not given if they appear in the title. References to the literature and mathematical symbols/equations should not be included.
4Keywords3 to 5, below the abstract.
Key words (3-5) should be provided below the Abstract to assist with indexing of the article.
5IntroductionThe objectives, the background and the hypotheses tested.
The Introduction should briefly indicate the objectives of the study and provide enough background information to clarify why the study was undertaken and what hypotheses were tested.
6Materials and methodsEnough detail for others to repeat the work.
This section should be concise but provide sufficient detail of the material used and equipment and the procedure followed to allow the work to be repeated by others.
7ResultsIn a logical order; the same data not repeated in tables and figures.
Results should be presented in a logical sequence in the text, tables and figures. Repetitive presentation of the same data in tables and figures should be avoided. The results should not contain material appropriate to the Discussion. All tables, graphs, statistical analyses and sample calculations should be presented in this section.
8DiscussionResults against the hypotheses, sources of error, limitations and context.
The results should be discussed in relation to any hypotheses advanced in the Introduction. Comment on results and indicate possible sources of error. Place the study in the context of other work reported in the literature. Only in exceptional cases should the “Results and Discussion” sections be combined. Refer to graphs, tables and figures by number. This helps tie the data into the text in a very effective manner. Authors should also take future research and limitations into account in the Discussion section.
9ConclusionThe main conclusions and their contribution.
The main conclusions of the experimental work should be presented. The contribution of the work to the scientific community and its economic implications should be emphasized.
10AcknowledgementTechnical help, and financial support (also declared in the submission form).
The source of financial support must be acknowledged. Authors declare any financial support or relationships that may pose a conflict of interest in the submission form. Technical assistance may also be acknowledged.
11Funding informationEvery funder of the work.
The authors should acknowledge the funders of this manuscript and provide all necessary funding information.
12Author contributionsWhat each author did.
Authors are required to include a statement of responsibility in the manuscript that specifies the contribution of every author. The level of detail varies; some disciplines produce manuscripts that comprise discrete efforts readily articulated in detail, whereas other fields operate as group efforts at all stages.
13Conflict of interestA statement for every author, before the references.
Include a conflict-of-interest statement in the manuscript, before the references: name each author’s financial, personal or other associations that could influence the work, or write “The authors declare no conflict of interest.” The same declaration is made in the submission form.
14ReferencesComplete and accurate; published or in-press works only.
It is the Authors responsibility to ensure that the information in each reference is complete and accurate. Only published and “in press” references should appear in the reference list.
15TablesSelf-contained and numbered, the legend above, no vertical lines.
Tables should be self-contained and the data should not be duplicated in figures. Tables should be numbered consecutively. Each table should be presented on a separate page with a comprehensive but concise legend above the table. Tables should be double-spaced and vertical lines should not be used to separate columns. Column headings should be brief, with units of measurement in parentheses. All abbreviations should be defined in footnotes. Use superscript letters (not numbers) for footnotes and keep footnotes to a minimum. *, **, *** should be reserved for P values.
16FiguresNumbered and cited in order, at least 300 dpi, legends that stand alone.
Only necessary illustrations should be included. All illustrations (line drawings and photographs) are classified as figures. Figures should be cited in consecutive order in the text. Figures should be sized to fit within the column or the full text width. Line figures should be supplied as sharp, black and white or color diagrams, drawn with a computer graphics package. Photographs should be sharp and magnifications should be indicated on photographs using a scale bar. Graphics should be supplied as high-resolution (at least 300 d.p.i.) electronic files. Digital images supplied as low-resolution cannot be used and will not be accepted. The legend should incorporate definitions of any symbols used and all abbreviations and units of measurement should be explained so that the figure can be understood without reference to the text.
17Abbreviations and unitsSI units and standard abbreviations; “Fig.” except at the start of a sentence.
SI units as outlined in the latest edition of Units, symbols and Abbreviations: A Guide for Medical and Scientific Editors and Authors (Royal Society of Medicine Press, London), should be used wherever possible. Statistics and measurements should always be given in figures; except where the number begins the sentence. When the number does not refer to a unit measurement, it is spelt out, except where the number is greater than nine. Use only standard abbreviations. The word Figure should be shortened to Fig. unless starting a sentence.
Article types, length and references
- Research article
- Original research, with the parts above.
- Review article
- A critical survey of a field, with the parts that apply.
- Case report
- A single case or a short series, with the patients’ consent.
- Research note
- A short report of one focused result.
Length: the abstract is up to 300 words; there is no limit on the length of the article.
References: any consistent style for the first submission; after acceptance, the journal’s style from the templates. Give the DOI of every reference that has one.
Language: we do not offer a language-editing service. If your English needs work, we suggest an independent editing service of your choice before you submit; using one does not affect the decision. After acceptance, production does only light editing.
Declare
- Conflicts of interest of every author
- Funding, with grant numbers
- A data availability statement
- Ethics approval and consent, for research with people or animals
- Any use of generative AI: the tool and what it was used for
Submit through My SciPub
- Every author’s CRediT role, and ORCID iDs where authors have them
- The corresponding author named: only they act on the manuscript. If you name someone else, they confirm by a personal link within 7 days, and screening waits until they do.
- Up to three suggested reviewers, none from your institution (optional, but recommended)
- Submitted to this journal only
- A cover letter (optional; template under Downloads)
Peer review
The office screens the manuscript within 3 days, against criteria the journal’s editor-in-chief sets. It may return it to you for corrections, which are due within 14 days, or reject it at screening, with reasons; a rejection at screening can be appealed to the editor-in-chief. Otherwise the handling editor invites at least three reviewers; reviews are due 21 days after the invitation, and the decision needs at least two reviews and follows within 7 days of the last one.
A revision is due within 14 days for a minor revision and 42 for a major one, with a reminder 7 days before. If the editor rejects the manuscript but offers a transfer to another of our journals, answer within 14 days, or the rejection stands; a transferred manuscript gets a new manuscript ID and keeps its submission date.
Your manuscript page in My SciPub shows each step and whose move it is, and we email you at every major event. Your co-authors are told, view only, when it is submitted, decided, withdrawn or closed, and published.
Peer review process