Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 31 December 2009

Effects of 7-E, KWL and Conventional Instruction on Analytical Thinking, Learning Achievement and Attitudes toward Chemistry Learning

Rungrawee Siribunnam & Sombat Tayraukham

Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp. 279–282 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.279.282

9,078 accesses7,171 downloads16 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: The purposes of this research were to compare in analytical thinking, science learning achievement and attitudes toward chemistry learning of Matthayomsuksa 5 students who learned using the 7-E learning cycle, KWL learning method and conventional approach. Approach: The sample consisted of 154 Matthayomsuksa 5 students attending in the first semester of the academic year 2008, Phayakkhaphumwitthayakhan School, Phayakkhaphumphisai District, Mahasarakham Province, cluster random sampling technique was employed. The were divided into two experimental groups who learned using the 7-E learning cycle and KWL learning activities and one control group who learned using the conventional approach. Results: The research instruments were: (1) 12 lesson plans for organization of 7-E learning cycle, 12 lesson plans for organization of KWL learning method and 12 lesson plans for organization of the conventional approach; (2) A 30-item analytical thinking test; (3) A 40-item achievement test of science learning achievement and (4) A 20-item of attitudes toward chemistry learning. The statistics used for analyzing the collected data were mean, standard deviation, F-test (one-way MANOVA), Hotelling’s T2 and Univariate t-test. The results of the study revealed that the students who learned using the 7-E learning cycle, KWL learning method and the conventional approach were differently showed analytical thinking, science learning achievement and attitudes toward chemistry learning at the 0.05 level of significance. The students who learned using the 7-E learning cycle showed more science learning achievement than did the students who learned using KWL learning method. Also the result and indicated than analytical thinking, science learning achievement and attitudes toward chemistry learning higher than did the students who learned using the conventional approach. In addition, the students who learned using KWL learning method showed higher analytical thinking than did the students who learned using the conventional approach at the 0.05 level of significance. Conclusion: In conclusion, students who learned using the 7-E learning cycle showed analytical thinking, science learning achievement and attitudes toward chemistry learning higher than did the students who learned by KWL learning and the conventional approach. Therefore, teachers should be supported to implement the 7-E learning cycle in science teaching in the future.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2009 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Siribunnam, R. & Tayraukham, S. (2009). Effects of 7-E, KWL and Conventional Instruction on Analytical Thinking, Learning Achievement and Attitudes toward Chemistry Learning. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 279–282. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.279.282

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 5, Issue 4
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Effects of 7-E, KWL and Conventional Instruction on Analytical Thinking, Learning Achievement and Attitudes toward Chemistry LearningJournal of Social Sciences · Volume 5, Issue 4 · pp. 279–282 · © Science PublicationsDownload