Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 30 June 2005

Time-series Evidence for Export-led Growth Paradigm: A Case Study of Zimbabwe

Cyril A. Ogbokor

Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp. 77–80 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2005.77.80

7,453 accesses4,874 downloads2 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

The study addresses empirically the Export-led Growth Hypothesis (ELGH) using Zimbabwe as a case study. This research work attempts to provide some evidence in this regard by examining the influence of trade on economic growth in the economy and ascertaining if the regressors utilised are good predictors of growth. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) method is resorted in order to estimate the specified equations used in the study. The time-series data utilized runs from 1991 to 2003. The results of the study confirm the existence of the export-led growth model in Zimbabwe. In the face of continual instability in its export receipts, we recommend that fundamental economic and political restructuring should be embarked upon in order to address and subsequently reverse the present situation.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2005 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Ogbokor, C. A. (2005). Time-series Evidence for Export-led Growth Paradigm: A Case Study of Zimbabwe. Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2005.77.80

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 1, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Time-series Evidence for Export-led Growth Paradigm: A Case Study of ZimbabweJournal of Social Sciences · Volume 1, Issue 2 · pp. 77–80 · © Science PublicationsDownload