Sign inSubmit
computersciencejournal.org is not ours. This journal is published only at thescipub.com/jcs. Report a suspicious emailcomputersciencejournal.org is not ours · Report
ArticleMetrics
Review Article · Open access · Published 16 February 2026

A Survey of Quadratization Methods Used in QUBO Formulations and their Usage in Quantum and Digital Annealing

Geethika Prabhath1, Anuradha Mahasinghe2, Nalin Ranasinghe1 & Kasun De Zoysa1

Journal of Computer Science, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp. 309–333 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2026.309.333

2,554 accesses981 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Quantum annealing is a metaheuristic method aimed at finding the global minimum of a pseudo-Boolean quadratic function. To solve a problem by a quantum annealer, it must be restated as a QUBO (quadratic unconstrained binary optimization) problem, the standard format acceptable to an annealer. However, there are many natural problems that turn out be of cubic or higher order, yet promising solutions can be obtained for many instances using quantum annealers, after converting to the QUBO format, using order reduction criteria. Accordingly, quadratization becomes a crucial preprocessing step in order to make use of present-day quantum annealing hardware that relies on coupling technology, which can only process interactions of at most degree two. A critical challenge is that quadratization methods often require many additional variables, degrading the performance of the annealers. A number of algorithmic and heuristic quadratization techniques have been proposed and used for annealing in the literature, affecting the performance of the annealers differently. We examine a number of such quadratization techniques, focusing on their efficiency, compactness, and applicability. We analyze the approaches motivated by diverse goals and highlight the transition from foundational approaches to more recent compact approaches. An evaluation of the current usage of different quadratization methods in the literature is carried out at the end of the survey. Further, we comment on the limitations on usage and show possible opportunities to enhance the performance of annealers.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Prabhath, G., Mahasinghe, A., Ranasinghe, N. & Zoysa, K. D. (2026). A Survey of Quadratization Methods Used in QUBO Formulations and their Usage in Quantum and Digital Annealing. Journal of Computer Science, 22(1), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2026.309.333

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 22, Issue 1
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
A Survey of Quadratization Methods Used in QUBO Formulations and their Usage in Quantum and Digital AnnealingJournal of Computer Science · Volume 22, Issue 1 · pp. 309–333 · CC BY 4.0Download