Sign inSubmit
computersciencejournal.org is not ours. This journal is published only at thescipub.com/jcs. Report a suspicious emailcomputersciencejournal.org is not ours · Report
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 4 March 2026

A Systematic Review of Metaheuristic-Metaheuristic (MH-MH) Hybridizations for Optimization

Augustina Dede Agor1, Frank Kataka Banaseka1, Prince Silas Kwesi Oberko1, Linda Amoako Banning2, Stephen Kofi Dotse1 & Emmanuel Junior Tapany3

Journal of Computer Science, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp. 660–678 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2026.660.678

2,183 accesses981 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

This systematic review following the PRISMA framework analyzes metaheuristic-metaheuristic (MH-MH) hybridizations published between January and October 2024 to uncover patterns of algorithmic dominance, functional roles and integration strategies, metaphor-based partnerships, domain mappings and evaluation orientations. Frequency mapping of 105 canonical algorithms identified Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) as the three most recurrent MHs, appearing in 20 (19.2%), 14 (13.5%), and 9 (8.7%) studies, respectively. Functional and structural analysis focused on PSO as the leading applied MH revealed its dual role as a global exploration driver and local exploitation engine, supported by balanced adoption of cooperative (45%) and sequential (45%) integration strategies. In comparison, embedded configurations accounted for the remaining 10%. Metaphor-based partner classification of the three most frequently applied canonical MHs showed that most hybrids combined flying and terrestrial swarm algorithms. Evaluation orientation analysis of the three most applied MHs indicated a gradual shift from benchmark-based validation toward domain-driven assessment, particularly in energy systems (30%), biomedical and health analytics (20%), and networking applications (15%). The review demonstrates that MH-MH hybrid success in 2024 is shaped by three interdependent design principles: Algorithmic complementarity that ensures exploration-exploitation balance, metaphorical congruence that sustains behavioral coherence, and evaluation coherence that aligns methodological rigor with domain relevance. These findings establish a unified empirical and theoretical foundation for the development of interpretable, adaptive, and reproducible hybrids.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Agor, A. D., Banaseka, F. K., Oberko, P. S. K., Banning, L. A., Dotse, S. K. & Tapany, E. J. (2026). A Systematic Review of Metaheuristic-Metaheuristic (MH-MH) Hybridizations for Optimization. Journal of Computer Science, 22(2), 660–678. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2026.660.678

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 22, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
A Systematic Review of Metaheuristic-Metaheuristic (MH-MH) Hybridizations for OptimizationJournal of Computer Science · Volume 22, Issue 2 · pp. 660–678 · CC BY 4.0Download