Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Literature Review · Open access · Published 29 January 2026

Remineralization Potential of Bioactive Composite Resins: A Systematic Review

Luiza Maria Schneider1, Maria Ritha Veiga Colognese1, Poliana Maria de Faveri Cardoso1, Márcio José Mendonça1, Julio Katuhide Ueda1 & Veridiana Camilotti1

Current Research in Dentistry, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp. 1–7 · doi.org/10.3844/crdsp.2026.1.7

3,135 accesses1,384 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical performance and potential of giomer-based materials in promoting the remineralization of dental structures through a systematic review of the literature. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to March 2024. “giomer,” “S-PRG,” “bioactive restorative materials,” “remineralization,” and “dental caries.” Inclusion criteria comprised clinical studies involving human subjects, with follow-up periods of at least 6 months, evaluating outcomes such as caries recurrence, marginal adaptation, and material retention based on USPHS and ICDAS criteria. Out of the studies included, giomer-based sealants demonstrated a low incidence of secondary caries, with one study reporting only one case in a 48-month period, considered clinically insignificant. In terms of retention, only 6% of giomer sealants remained fully retained after 18 months in one study. For Class V restorations, retention ranged from 82.5% (alpha) to 17.5% (Charlie) depending on the study, and in Class I and II restorations, performance varied by location (occlusal vs. non-occlusal). Across multiple studies, giomer materials consistently showed superior surface finish and color matching compared to conventional materials. However, retention performance was often inferior. Giomer-based restorative materials containing S-PRG particles exhibit promising results in maintaining healthy dental structures and preventing caries progression, despite variable retention outcomes. Their aesthetic and marginal adaptation properties make them suitable for use in Class I, II, and V restorations. Further long-term clinical trials are necessary to strengthen evidence regarding their remineralizing potential.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, L. M., Colognese, M. R. V., Cardoso, P. M. F., Mendonça, M. J., Ueda, J. K. & Camilotti, V. (2026). Remineralization Potential of Bioactive Composite Resins: A Systematic Review. Current Research in Dentistry, 17(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3844/crdsp.2026.1.7

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 17, Issue 1
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Remineralization Potential of Bioactive Composite Resins: A Systematic ReviewCurrent Research in Dentistry · Volume 17, Issue 1 · pp. 1–7 · CC BY 4.0Download