Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 29 January 2026

Comparative Analysis of Surface Microhardness and Antimicrobial Activity of Conventional and Bioactive Composite Materials for Dental Restorations

Bruno Fongaro Dalbosco1, Rafael da Silva Vanolli1, Poliana Maria de Faveri Cardoso1, Maria Ritha Veiga Colognese1, Carlos Eduardo Misiak Godoy1, Julio Katuhide Ueda1 & Veridiana Camilotti1

Current Research in Dentistry, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp. 18–23 · doi.org/10.3844/crdsp.2025.18.23

2,809 accesses1,167 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

This study evaluated the fluoride release capability, antimicrobial activity, and surface microhardness of bioactive composite resins, critical properties for the effectiveness and durability of dental materials in restorative procedures. Conventional and bioactive composite resins with varying viscosities were tested. Specimens of each resin type were prepared and stored in physiological saline solution for 24 hours to simulate oral conditions. Surface hardness was measured using a Knoop hardness test, assessing material resistance to indentation. Antibacterial activity was evaluated by immersing the specimens in a culture medium containing Streptococcus mutants, a common cariogenic bacterium, for 24 hours. After immersion, the specimens were washed to remove non-adherent bacteria, allowing for an accurate count of viable bacterial colonies. Results showed that bioactive composite resins exhibited lower surface microhardness compared to conventional resins lacking Giomer technology. However, bioactive resins demonstrated significant antibacterial activity. This suggests that while bioactive resins may be softer, their ability to inhibit bacterial growth could offer clinical benefits. The integration of Giomer technology in composite resins is a promising strategy to enhance antimicrobial properties and potentially reduce secondary caries. Nonetheless, the observed decrease in surface microhardness highlights a trade-off that may impact the material's longevity and wear resistance. Further research is necessary to optimize the balance between antimicrobial efficacy and mechanical strength in advanced dental materials.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Dalbosco, B. F., Vanolli, R. D. S., Cardoso, P. M. F., Colognese, M. R. V., Godoy, C. E. M., Ueda, J. K. & Camilotti, V. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Surface Microhardness and Antimicrobial Activity of Conventional and Bioactive Composite Materials for Dental Restorations. Current Research in Dentistry, 16(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.3844/crdsp.2025.18.23

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 16, Issue 1
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Comparative Analysis of Surface Microhardness and Antimicrobial Activity of Conventional and Bioactive Composite Materials for Dental RestorationsCurrent Research in Dentistry · Volume 16, Issue 1 · pp. 18–23 · CC BY 4.0Download