Comparison between Financial Ratios Analysis and Balanced Scorecard
Khalad M.S. Alrafadi1 & Mazila Md-Yusuf2 Show affiliations
- Universiti Teknology MARA (UiTM), Malaysia
- University Teknology MARA (UiTM)), Malaysia
American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp. 618–622 · doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.618.622
Abstract
Financial ratios have long been used as a tool to evaluate the overall financial performance of a company. However, in early 1990s, a new method called Balanced Scorecard has been introduced by Robert Kaplan and David Norton to evaluate the overall controlling of a company. Problem statement: To the best of my knowledge at present there are no letrature review comparing between Financial ratios and Balanced Scorecard. Approach: This study is a conceptual paper comparing between the financial ratios analysis and balanced scorecard method. The objective of this paper is to compare between the benefits and problems of using financial ratios analysis and Balanced Scorecard method in evaluating the overall control of the company. Results: As a result, we found that the Balanced Scorecard is more efficient than financial ratios analysis. Conclusion/Recommendations: Both the balanced scorecard and financial ratios analysis are important tools for evaluating performance. So, we cannot ignore either of them.
Licence and reuse
Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2011 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Alrafadi, K. M. & Md-Yusuf, M. (2011). Comparison between Financial Ratios Analysis and Balanced Scorecard. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(4), 618–622. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.618.622
- Licence
- © Science Publications
- Issue
- Volume 3, Issue 4
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
