Thermal Comfort Assessment-A Study Toward Workers’ Satisfaction in a Low Energy Office Building
Mohd Nafiz Shaharon1 & Juliana Jalaludin1 Show affiliations
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (43400), Serdang, Malaysia
American Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 9, Issue 7, pp. 1037–1045 · doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2012.1037.1045
Abstract
Problem statement: The government of Malaysia has raised their concerns towards the issue of workers comfort and workspace quality in a Low Energy Office (LEO) building. New energy efficient building concepts and technologies require a revision of comfort standards, to create a suitable thermal condition in avoiding occupant dissatisfaction, adverse effect on their productivity and overall building performance. Approach: Assessment was conducted using Babuc-A (Portable air quality monitor) and sets of questionnaire adapted from ASHRAE-2004 were 99 respondents selected using a stratified random sampling. Results: This study shows that the thermal comfort zone temperature was identified to be within the range of 21.6-23.6°C and relative humidity of 42-54%. Conclusion: The results suggested that the thermal condition was in the acceptable range of ISO7730 and a lower room temperature was preferred by Malaysian in an office environment compared with the temperature criteria cited in ASHRAE-55. To create an optimum comfortable workplace, temperature between 20-26°C and relative humidity between 40-60% must be maintained. Adequate ventilation must be provided at the minimum rate of 10 l/s of fresh air per person for general office space or every 10 m2 of floor space.
Licence and reuse
Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2012 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Shaharon, M. N. & Jalaludin, J. (2012). Thermal Comfort Assessment-A Study Toward Workers’ Satisfaction in a Low Energy Office Building. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(7), 1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2012.1037.1045
- Licence
- © Science Publications
- Issue
- Volume 9, Issue 7
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
