Sugarcane Response to Water-Deficit Stress during Early Growth on Organic and Sand Soils

Since publication

Views and downloads by month

Citing articles (59)

Read from Crossref’s cited-by service every week, newest first.

1. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2026.124450Found 9 October 2026
2. doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04141-8_7Found 4 June 2026
3. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0338698Found 14 December 2025
4. doi:10.1007/s12355-025-01687-yFound 23 November 2025
5. doi:10.1002/plr2.20056Found 23 October 2025
6. doi:10.1080/1343943x.2025.2523059Found 28 June 2025
7. doi:10.3390/agriengineering7050162Found 23 May 2025
8. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40359Found 18 November 2024
9. doi:10.3390/agriculture14111952Found 6 November 2024
10. doi:10.3390/agriculture13122234Found 7 December 2023
11. doi:10.3390/agronomy13102594Found 20 October 2023
12. doi:10.29133/yyutbd.1219965Found 17 June 2023
13. doi:10.1071/cp20161Found 10 March 2023
14. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2022.10.040Found 16 November 2022
15. doi:10.3923/ajps.2022.49.55Found 14 February 2022
16. doi:10.1002/plr2.20123Found 25 November 2021
17. doi:10.1007/s11738-021-03336-9Found 25 November 2021
18. doi:10.3390/agronomy11112319Found 19 November 2021
19. doi:10.1002/plr2.20186Found 20 October 2021
20. doi:10.1002/plr2.20178Found 30 September 2021
21. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-98002-yFound 22 September 2021
22. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110600Found 19 September 2021
23. doi:10.1626/jcs.90.324Found 9 August 2021
24. doi:10.1590/1983-21252020v33n429rcFound 25 November 2020
25. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106549Found 14 October 2020
26. doi:10.3198/jpr2016.08.0041crcFound 12 June 2020
27. doi:10.1007/s12355-016-0479-1Found 12 June 2020
28. doi:10.1002/9781119054450.ch13Found 12 June 2020
29. doi:10.1111/jac.12084Found 12 June 2020
30. doi:10.3198/jpr2017.09.0066crcFound 12 June 2020
31. doi:10.3198/jpr2018.08.0055crcFound 12 June 2020
32. doi:10.3198/jpr2019.03.0013crcFound 12 June 2020
33. doi:10.3198/jpr2014.01.0002crcFound 12 June 2020
34. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.11.015Found 12 June 2020
35. doi:10.3198/jpr2018.07.0050crcFound 12 June 2020
36. doi:10.1590/1413-70542018422021417Found 12 June 2020
37. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/418/1/012058Found 12 June 2020
38. doi:10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n3p170-175Found 12 June 2020
39. doi:10.1111/aab.12387Found 12 June 2020
40. doi:10.1007/s10722-014-0132-3Found 12 June 2020
41. doi:10.1007/s10816-017-9346-yFound 12 June 2020
42. doi:10.1094/pdis-10-10-0762Found 12 June 2020
43. doi:10.1007/s11105-014-0784-3Found 12 June 2020
44. doi:10.3390/agronomy5030341Found 12 June 2020
45. doi:10.1007/s40502-017-0328-6Found 12 June 2020
46. doi:10.1590/1413-70542017412029416Found 12 June 2020
47. doi:10.1080/15427528.2011.611926Found 12 June 2020
48. doi:10.1007/s12355-017-0566-yFound 12 June 2020
49. doi:10.3198/jpr2013.02.0007crcFound 12 June 2020
50. doi:10.3198/jpr2013.03.0012crcFound 12 June 2020
51. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.08.004Found 12 June 2020
52. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.010Found 12 June 2020
53. doi:10.2135/cropsci2012.09.0554Found 12 June 2020
54. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/423/1/012038Found 12 June 2020
55. doi:10.1080/1343943x.2018.1540277Found 12 June 2020
56. doi:10.1007/s12355-017-0564-0Found 12 June 2020
57. doi:10.3390/agronomy9040200Found 12 June 2020
58. doi:10.1002/plr2.20053Found 12 June 2020
59. doi:10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v35n2p215-229/2015Found 12 June 2020