Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 26 September 2026

Integrated Assessment of Water Resource Sustainability in the Upper Amojú River Basin, Northern Peruvian Andes

Juan Eduardo Suarez-Rivadeneira1, Freddy A. Manayay2, Mayra Pamela Musayón Diaz3, Wilfredo Ruiz Camacho3, Edilbrando Vega Calderón3, Daniel Olivier Carranza Lizana3, Jhosymar Bacalla Tenorio3, Juan Alberto Rojas Castillo3, Daniel Carranza Montenegro4, Eduer Blandimiro Bernilla Rodriguez5 & Juan Francisco Roble Ruiz6

OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp. 080 · doi.org/10.3844/ojbsci.2026.26.04.080

719 accesses338 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive, statistically robust assessment of water resource sustainability in the upper section of the Amojú River Basin, Province of Jaén northern Peruvian Andes, using the Sarandón multi-cirteria methodology. A stratified convenience sample of n = 887 households distributed across 22 localities was surveyed, achieving a margin of error of ±2.61% at the 95% confidence level (finite-population correction applied; N = 2391). Sustainability was assessed across social, environmental, and economic dimensions on a standardised ordinal scale (0–4). Statistical analyses included Shapiro Wilk normality tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests against the sustainability threshold (μ₀ = 2.0), Spearman rank correlations, Kruskal Wallis tests, Cronbach’s α for internal consistency, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to provide empirical support for the indicator weighting structure. The General Sustainability Index (I = 2.32±0.52; median = 2) confirmed that the basin operates at the minimum threshold of sustainability, with 97.4% of respondents classified as sustainable. The Social (SI = 2.52±0.75), Environmental (EI = 2.18±0.39), and Economic (KI = 2.30±0.67) indices all met the threshold criterion (≥2.0). Wilcoxon tests identified three sub-indicators as significantly below the sustainability threshold (all p<0.001): Conservation Zones (mean = 0.59±0.78; 89.4% of respondents scored <2), Solid Waste Management (mean = 1.23±0.89; 68.3% scored <2), and Water Flow Perception (mean = 1.16±0.52; 90.9% scored <2). All three dimension indices were significantly intercorrelated (ρ = 0.271–0.388, p<0.001) and contributed significantly to the general index (ρ = 0.510–0.705, p<0.001). Kruskal Wallis tests confirmed that sub-indicators differed significantly within each dimension (H>971, p<0.001 for all). These findings underscore the urgent need for integrated watershed governance encompassing solid waste management programmes, biodiversity conservation zones, and equitable water tariff policies in Andean headwater basins.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Suarez-Rivadeneira, J. E., Manayay, F. A., Diaz, M. P. M., Camacho, W. R., Calderón, E. V., Lizana, D. O. C., Tenorio, J. B., Castillo, J. A. R., Montenegro, D. C., Rodriguez, E. B. B. & Ruiz, J. F. R. (2026). Integrated Assessment of Water Resource Sustainability in the Upper Amojú River Basin, Northern Peruvian Andes. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, 26(4), 080. https://doi.org/10.3844/ojbsci.2026.26.04.080

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 26, Issue 4
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Integrated Assessment of Water Resource Sustainability in the Upper Amojú River Basin, Northern Peruvian AndesOnLine Journal of Biological Sciences · Volume 26, Issue 4 · pp. 080 · CC BY 4.0Download