Classroom Discipline, Why Teachers are Leaving, Because of Their Failure to Understand Methods of Discipline?
Gurudeo Anand Tularam1 & Omar Moalin Hassan1 Show affiliations
- Department of Mathematics, Griffith University, Australia
Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp. 120–135 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2025.120.135
Abstract
Classroom discipline for secondary education is an indispensable way of creating inclusive learning environments. It encompasses theoretical perspectives, ranging from encouraging student engagement to minimizing disruptive behaviours to promoting academic growth. This paper reviews the literature related to the following popular classroom management theories: behaviourist, social learning theory, humanistic, cognitive, and sociocultural; the models of discipline include assertive discipline, restorative practices, Positive Behavioural Interventions and Supports (PBIS), and Culturally Responsive Classroom Management (CRCM). Such a comparison of analyses has shown both strengths and limitations of different approaches; hence, the effectiveness in various educational settings. A critical discussion has underlined the need for adaptive, evidence-based strategies and has identified some areas for further research beyond current limitations. A five-point plan is suggested for accomplishing effective classroom management.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Tularam, G. A. & Hassan, O. M. (2025). Classroom Discipline, Why Teachers are Leaving, Because of Their Failure to Understand Methods of Discipline?. Journal of Social Sciences, 21(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2025.120.135
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
- Issue
- Volume 21, Issue 1
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
