Internal Migration and Poverty Reduction: Rethinking the Debate on the North-South Movement in Ghana
Richard Serbeh1, Prince Osei-Wusu Adjei2 & Thomas Yeboah1 Show affiliations
- University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana
Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp. 42–54 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2016.42.54
Abstract
In the past few years the nexus that link internal migration and poverty reduction has been a subject of interest among researchers and policy makers. Internal movements constitute a major coping mechanism in poverty stricken areas although the evidence supporting this claim is equivocal. This paper critically examines the extent to which internal migration could acts as an important route out of poverty in areas where conventional poverty reduction policies have failed by drawing on empirical literature on the north-south movement in Ghana. We argue that internal migration may not be a silver bullet in the fight against poverty. This position is premised on two strands of thought. First, migrants may not always be able to improve upon their livelihood, earn income and leap-out of the malaise of poverty and the impact of remittances may not also be straightforward. Secondly, the very poor in the places where conventional development efforts have had limited success may not always have the wherewithal to move as migration is shaped inter alia by institutional, market and financial resources.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Serbeh, R., Adjei, P. O. & Yeboah, T. (2016). Internal Migration and Poverty Reduction: Rethinking the Debate on the North-South Movement in Ghana. Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2016.42.54
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 12, Issue 1
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
