On the Systematic Variation of German Idioms: Converse Pairs as a Constructional Phenomenon
Dmitrij Dobrovol′skij1 Show affiliations
- Russian Language Institute, Russia
Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp. 248–257 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2015.248.257
Abstract
This paper presents some findings of my research on the systematic variation of German idioms, with attention focused on converse transformations such as (jmdm.) eins/eine/einen aufs Dach geben literally "to give someone <let someone have> one on the roof", meaning 'to strike <beat> someone' or 'to punish someone' – eins/eine/einen aufs Dach bekommen (von jmdm.) literally "to get one on the roof from someone", meaning 'to be struck <beaten> by someone' or 'to be punished by someone'. To be subjected to converse transformations an idiom must have two active valencies. These valencies are usually filled by the Agent and Patient, more seldom by the Agent and Addressee or Beneficiary. This semantico-syntactic condition is also a constructional phenomenon because it is governed by the argument structure of a given expression. Within every semantic field, a certain constructional pattern underlies the converse transformation. Cf. for the semantic fields (1) PHYSICAL COERCION, PHYSICAL VIOLENCE and (2) PUNISHMENT, which is derived from (1): [X gab eins in/auf "gave one in/on" {body part} of Y] meaning 'X struck <beat> Y' ↔ [Y bekam eins in/auf "got one in/on" {body part} of Y vom "from" X] meaning 'Y was struck <was beaten> by X'.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Dobrovol′skij, D. (2015). On the Systematic Variation of German Idioms: Converse Pairs as a Constructional Phenomenon. Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2015.248.257
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 11, Issue 3
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
