Compensating Companion Animal Owners for Veterinary Malpractice Through an Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism
Terence J. Centner & Nikita Smeshko
Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp. 597–604 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2011.597.604
Abstract
Problem statement: Many people own pets for companionship and become attached to their animals. Given this attachment, some owners contract for veterinary services to extend the lives of their pets and may spend more money for veterinary care than their animals are worth. If their pet dies due to veterinary malpractice, they only receive a nominal sum for damages. Approach: The research seeks a regulatory solution to compensate companion-pet owners in instances where veterinary malpractice causes injury to or the death of a pet. Under current law, remedies for veterinary malpractice do not recognize the pets' actual value. Results: As values change, legislatures can address inequities. A proposed "Companion Animal Compensation Program" sets forth a solution for paying modest amounts for veterinary malpractice that would avoid excessive litigation and large jury awards. Conclusion: To give greater value to companion animals, states can take action to establish an administrative procedure to compensate companion animal owners who lose animals due to veterinary malpractice.
Licence and reuse
Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2011 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Centner, T. J. & Smeshko, N. (2011). Compensating Companion Animal Owners for Veterinary Malpractice Through an Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism. Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2011.597.604
- Licence
- © Science Publications
- Issue
- Volume 7, Issue 4
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
