Sign inSubmit
ArticleArticle metrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 10 August 2011

Quality of Life of the Rural Community: A Comparison between Three Cities

Sulaiman M. Yassin, Hayrol A.M. Shaffril, Bahaman A. Samah, Md. S. Hassan, Mohd S. Othman, Asnarulkhadi A. Samah & Siti A. Ramli

Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp. 508–515 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2011.508.515

8,364 accesses4,978 downloads3 citations (Crossref)Journal metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: Pahang and Muar Rivers are two major rivers in Malaysia. In the past, these two rivers did play an important role in flourishing the economic activities of the local community and upgrading their quality of life. Does the community along these two rivers have a good quality of life? Answers for this question will bring us to the main objective of this study which is to investigate the level of quality of life of the community living along Pahang River and Muar River and to investigate any difference that might occur between the communities in Pekan, Bahau and Muar. Approach: Each of the cities is represented by 300 respondents making the overall total respondents selected for this study was 900. This is a quantitative study and a questionnaire was used to gain the data needed. A total of seven aspects of quality of life namely home condition, physical environment, safety at the areas, social involvement and relationship, education, financial and job security and infrastructure facilities had been studied. Results: Results gained have revealed that community along Pahang River and Muar River do have a high level of quality of life. And further analysis using ANOVA have shown that there are significant differences in six of the aspects of quality of life studied. There was no significant difference identified in the aspect of education. Conclusion/Recommendation: It can be concluded that the community that live along Pahang River and Muar River have a high level in all aspects of QOL studied. It can be concluded that community in Pekan managed to record the highest mean score in three aspects of quality of life namely (1) physical environment; (2) safety at the areas and (3) social involvement and relationship. Community in Muar managed to record the highest mean score in three aspects namely (1) education; (2) financial and job security and 3) infrastructure facilities while community if Bahau was identified to have the highest mean score in the aspect of home condition.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2011 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Yassin, S. M., Shaffril, H. A., Samah, B. A., Hassan, M. S., Othman, M. S., Samah, A. A. & Ramli, S. A. (2011). Quality of Life of the Rural Community: A Comparison between Three Cities. Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 508–515. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2011.508.515

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 7, Issue 4
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Quality of Life of the Rural Community: A Comparison between Three CitiesJournal of Social Sciences · Volume 7, Issue 4 · pp. 508–515 · © Science PublicationsDownload