Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 30 June 2010

Secularism and Theism: A Problem of Rationality

Michael Roess

Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp. 229–233 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.229.233

8,194 accesses4,418 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: A belief prevails today that pluralist liberal societies and genuine religious belief are incompatible. Until this belief is overcome it is unlikely that progress can be made toward dialogue between liberal pluralists, who pride themselves on their open-mindedness and rationality, and religious conservatives in America and theocrats elsewhere who esteem their devotion equally highly. Approach: Compare the rationality of "paradigm shifts" and that of religious conversion. Results: There was no difference in rationality between scientific progress when understood as a "paradigm shift" and that between conversion from theism to atheism or vice versa. Conclusion: Neither secularists nor theists were justified in their belief that liberalism and theism are incompatible. Pluralities of beliefs are all equally justifiable in terms of reason.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2010 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Roess, M. (2010). Secularism and Theism: A Problem of Rationality. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.229.233

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 6, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Secularism and Theism: A Problem of RationalityJournal of Social Sciences · Volume 6, Issue 2 · pp. 229–233 · © Science PublicationsDownload