Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 30 June 2008

Reconsidering the Understanding of Technoscientific Knowledge

Charalambos Tsekeris & Ioannis Katerelos

Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp. 75–79 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2008.75.79

7,815 accesses4,640 downloads1 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Nowadays, science and technology have immediate and powerful social impacts. Therefore, their systematic study is not possible without attention to questions of citizenship and democracy. Building upon this critical discussion, the present paper seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the changes in the lay and expert understanding of technoscientific knowledge. The presentation and analysis of these changes is mainly conceived in terms of significant sociological issues: the logic of the "public understanding of science", the search for alternative technological projects and the radical reconstruction of "expertise" and "knowledge politics". The necessity to adequately address these issues is vital for the future of civil society and the quality of our everyday life.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2008 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Tsekeris, C. & Katerelos, I. (2008). Reconsidering the Understanding of Technoscientific Knowledge. Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2008.75.79

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 4, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Reconsidering the Understanding of Technoscientific KnowledgeJournal of Social Sciences · Volume 4, Issue 2 · pp. 75–79 · © Science PublicationsDownload