Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 30 September 2008

Favorableness-Reality Index

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Jalal Ayoubinejad, Mojtaba Maghrebi & Mahmoud Reza Keymanesh

Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp. 173–177 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2008.173.177

7,257 accesses4,579 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

By constructing a systematic structure of processes, decision models would give the most comprehensive and appropriate decision out of the variety of choices. As an instance, Analytic Hierarchy Process model (AHP) has helped to perfect interpretation and systematic decision. Application of this model in control process and evaluation of organization performance were investigated. The opinion of senior chief managers and mid managers about organizational priorities in terms of plan's elements and organizational politicians was gathered via inquiring forms and real performance was specified. The results were analyzed by AHP model and finally, Favorableness-Reality Index (FRI) was defined for performance evaluation. For instance, implementation plan of quality management system in a consulting firm was perused.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2008 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmadinejad, M., Ayoubinejad, J., Maghrebi, M. & Keymanesh, M. R. (2008). Favorableness-Reality Index. Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2008.173.177

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 4, Issue 3
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Favorableness-Reality IndexJournal of Social Sciences · Volume 4, Issue 3 · pp. 173–177 · © Science PublicationsDownload