Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 31 December 2007

Does Subjective Class Predict the Causal Attribution for Poverty?

Ramzi N. Nasser

Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp. 197–201 · doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.197.201

7,719 accesses5,485 downloads17 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

This study investigated the attributions for poverty among secondary school and university students in relation to socio-economic. The questionnaire was adapted from Feagin's[1] and Abouchedid & Nasser[2], and included 15-item poverty questionnaire. It was administered to a sample (n = 242) of secondary school and university students from public and private schools and universities in Lebanon. Findings showed that Lebanese youth were more inclined to attribute poverty to structural factors. Socioeconomic variable of parents' education was the only significant predictors for the causal attribution for poverty. Research in this area should extend to relate stereotypes and various socio-economic attitudes as liberalism or conservatism and their relation to attribution for poverty.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2007 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Nasser, R. N. (2007). Does Subjective Class Predict the Causal Attribution for Poverty? . Journal of Social Sciences, 3(4), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.197.201

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 3, Issue 4
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Does Subjective Class Predict the Causal Attribution for Poverty?Journal of Social Sciences · Volume 3, Issue 4 · pp. 197–201 · © Science PublicationsDownload