The Efficiency of Seven-Variable Box-Behnken Experimental Design with Varying Center Runs on Full and Reduced Model Types
Mary Paschal Iwundu1 & Joan Cosmos1 Show affiliations
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp. 196–207 · doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2022.196.207
Abstract
Response Surface Methodology is widely used in the optimization of industrial processes and products that depend on several experimental variables. One of the most tested and efficient second-order Response Surface Methodology designs is the Box-Behnken Design. This research explores the efficiency of a seven-variable Box-Behnken design with varying center runs, on full and reduced quadratic models. Backward Elimination and Forward Selection techniques are employed as the variable selection techniques for obtaining the reduced models, based on the Akaike Information Criterion. Fit Statistics and Design Efficiency values are obtained for the reduced models and are compared with those of the full model. Generally, results show that the reduced quadratic models perform best under one center-point run, thereby making the reduced models the most preferred in terms of the model fit and D-efficiency. Comparative analysis, based on G-efficiency, reveals that the full quadratic model performs better than the reduced models under one center-point Box-Behnken design.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Iwundu, M. P. & Cosmos, J. (2022). The Efficiency of Seven-Variable Box-Behnken Experimental Design with Varying Center Runs on Full and Reduced Model Types. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 18(1), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2022.196.207
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
- Issue
- Volume 18, Issue 1
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
