A COMPARISON BETWEEN CLASSICAL AND ROBUST METHOD IN A FACTORIAL DESIGN IN THE PRESENCE OF OUTLIER
Anwar Fitrianto1 & Habshah Midi2 Show affiliations
- Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia
- Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp. 193–197 · doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2013.193.197
Abstract
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) techniques which is based on classical Least Squares (LS) method requires several assumptions, such as normality, constant variances and independency. Those assumptions can be violated due to several causes, such as the presence of an outlying observation. There are many evident in literatures that the LS estimate is easily affected by outliers. To remedy this problem, a robust procedure that provides estimation, inference and testing that are not influenced by outlying observations is put forward. A well-known approach to handle dataset with outliers is the M-estimation. In this study, both classical and robust procedures are employed to data of a factorial experiment. The results signify that the classical method of least squares estimates instead of robust methods lead to misleading conclusion of the analysis in factorial designs.
Licence and reuse
Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2013 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Fitrianto, A. & Midi, H. (2013). A COMPARISON BETWEEN CLASSICAL AND ROBUST METHOD IN A FACTORIAL DESIGN IN THE PRESENCE OF OUTLIER. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 9(3), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2013.193.197
- Licence
- © Science Publications
- Issue
- Volume 9, Issue 3
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
