Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 18 May 2011

Dissecting Two Approaches to Energy Prices

Julius N. Esunge & Andrew Snyder-Beattie

Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 98–102 · doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2011.98.102

7,100 accesses4,759 downloads1 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: This research tested the viability of Geometric Brownian Motion as a stochastic model of oil prices. Approach: Using autoregressions and unit root tests, we determined that oil prices tend not to exhibit the Markov Property and thus GBM may be a problematic model. Results: Instead, oil prices seem to be mean reverting over the long run, possibly following an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Conclusion/Recommendations: To determine whether or not OPEC was the cause of mean reversion, we repeated the tests after controlling for quotas, only to find the same results did not apply over the short run.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2011 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Esunge, J. N. & Snyder-Beattie, A. (2011). Dissecting Two Approaches to Energy Prices. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 7(2), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2011.98.102

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 7, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Dissecting Two Approaches to Energy PricesJournal of Mathematics and Statistics · Volume 7, Issue 2 · pp. 98–102 · © Science PublicationsDownload