Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 31 March 2008

Percentile Double Ranked Set Sampling

Amer Ibrahim Al-Omari & Khalifa H. Jaber

Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 60–64 · doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2008.60.64

7,411 accesses5,423 downloads7 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

In this paper, percentile double ranked set sampling (PDRSS) method is suggested for estimating the population mean. The PDRSS method is compared with the simple random sampling (SRS), ranked set sampling (RSS), median ranked set sampling (MRSS) and the extreme ranked set sampling (ERSS) methods. When the underlying distribution is symmetric, it turns out that PDRSS produce unbiased estimators of the population mean and it is more efficient than SRS, RSS, MRSS and ERSS based on the same sample size. For asymmetric distribution considered in this study, it is shown that PDRSS has a small bias and it is more efficient than RSS, MRSS and ERSS for most cases considered in this study.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2008 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Omari, A. I. & Jaber, K. H. (2008). Percentile Double Ranked Set Sampling. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 4(1), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.3844/jmssp.2008.60.64

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 4, Issue 1
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Percentile Double Ranked Set SamplingJournal of Mathematics and Statistics · Volume 4, Issue 1 · pp. 60–64 · © Science PublicationsDownload