Self-Managed Federation of MQTT Brokers with Dynamic Topology Control
Bruno Bevilaqua1 & Marco Aurélio Spohn1 Show affiliations
- Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Fronteira Sul, Brazil
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 19, Issue 11, pp. 1398–1409 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2023.1398.1409
Abstract
The Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) protocol is most used in Internet of Things (IoT) applications. The protocol implements the Publish/Subscribe (P/S) communication model. Publishers are entities providing data to a server (broker), and subscribers are those showing interest in such data. The standard MQTT scenario relies on a single broker, a potential bottleneck, and a single point of failure. The best way to scale MQTT systems is through horizontal approaches like clustering and federation. In particular, this study focuses on improving the capabilities of a self-managed federation of brokers. We present the first solution to address the dynamic management of an overlay network for the federation of autonomous brokers. The system provides the primary mechanisms for building and self-healing the federation network. We develop a new variant for the original federation protocol integrating the dynamic topology management. We present a case study as a proof of concept, showing that all designed features work as expected.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Bevilaqua, B. & Spohn, M. A. (2023). Self-Managed Federation of MQTT Brokers with Dynamic Topology Control. Journal of Computer Science, 19(11), 1398–1409. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2023.1398.1409
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
- Issue
- Volume 19, Issue 11
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
