An Empirical Criterion for Transitive Closure
Marius Orlowski1 Show affiliations
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, United States
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 18, Issue 12, pp. 1232–1236 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2022.1232.1236
Abstract
The paper establishes a simple and computationally economical criterion for determining whether a given adjacency matrix represents a transitive closure or not. The criterion is based on a new iterative method for finding the transitive closure adjacency matrix. This method is equivalent to but computationally more efficient than the traditional Boolean sum of successive powers of the original adjacency matrix to determine the transitive closure matrix. However, it is computationally less efficient than the Warshall algorithm and the recent more advanced algorithms. Nevertheless, in many cases, in which a given matrix is different from the transitive closure, but may not differ much, a few of the proposed looping steps may suffice to find the transitive closure, avoiding the computational burden of the best-in-class algorithms. Thus, the criterion and the recursive relation are apt in complementing the extant methods to establish an efficient evaluation engine for the determination of the transitive closure.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Orlowski, M. (2022). An Empirical Criterion for Transitive Closure. Journal of Computer Science, 18(12), 1232–1236. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2022.1232.1236
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
- Issue
- Volume 18, Issue 12
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
