Financial Forecasting with Machine Learning: Price Vs Return
Firuz Kamalov1, Ikhlaas Gurrib1 & Khairan Rajab2 Show affiliations
- Canadian University Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- Najran University, Saudi Arabia
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp. 251–264 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2021.251.264
Abstract
Forecasting directional movement of stock price using machine learning tools has attracted a considerable amount of research. Two of the most common input features in a directional forecasting model are stock price and return. The choice between the former and the latter variables is often subjective. In this study, we compare the effectiveness of stock price and return as input features in directional forecasting models. We perform an extensive comparison of the two input features using 10-year historical data of ten large cap US companies. We employ four popular classification algorithms as the basis of the forecasting models used in our study. The results show that stock price is a more effective standalone input feature than return. The effectiveness of stock price and return equalize when we add technical indicators to the input feature set. We conclude that price is generally a more potent input feature than return value in predicting the direction of price movement. Our results should aid researchers and practitioners interested in applying machine learning models to stock price forecasting.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Kamalov, F., Gurrib, I. & Rajab, K. (2021). Financial Forecasting with Machine Learning: Price Vs Return. Journal of Computer Science, 17(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2021.251.264
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0
- Issue
- Volume 17, Issue 3
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
