A Framework for Computerized Progress Feedback in Tertiary Education
Annette van der Merwe1, Tiny du Toit1 & Hennie Kruger1 Show affiliations
- North-West University, South Africa
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp. 391–401 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.391.401
Abstract
The dawn of democracy in South Africa in 1994 has resulted in challenges in many fields, especially in education. University enrolment rates are high and the output quality of school learners in general is delicate which threatens the graduate quality of tertiary institutions. Contrary to rising student enrolments, the attrition rates have not improved. One contributing factor is the lack of comprehensive insight into students’ academic performance throughout the course of a program. New systems are being developed and implemented in both online and on-campus programs and can be utilized to improve student performance feedback. Prior studies served to identify the ideal elements, models and concepts necessary to develop a framework for academic progress feedback in the tertiary education environment. In this paper, a model-based academic progress feedback framework is proposed to improve learning. The framework was implemented in a case study at a South African university and evaluated using a survey. The framework was readily accepted by the end-users and conformed to the features and requirements identified in literature.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
van der Merwe, A., du Toit, T. & Kruger, H. (2020). A Framework for Computerized Progress Feedback in Tertiary Education. Journal of Computer Science, 16(3), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.391.401
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 16, Issue 3
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
