A Comparative Analysis of Biometrics Types: Literature Review
Mohammad Al Rousan1 & Benedetto Intrigila1 Show affiliations
- University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 16, Issue 12, pp. 1778–1788 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.1778.1788
Abstract
This study provides a thorough analysis of the various biometric types, including their advantages and disadvantages. It compares the different types and provides details about false acceptance and false rejection rates, along with their equations. Biometric screening systems are used to test and identify persons using their physiological or behavioral characteristics. Using only one recognition device is not suitable for identification systems. Multi-factor authentication can improve system security by using two or more kinds of security types, such as passwords and cards, but this is not an ideal security scheme. Passwords may be forgotten or inputted incorrectly, or the identification card may be stolen. To verify and classify people using their physiological attributes, biometric devices are used. These technologies can be classified as either behavioral or physiological biometrics. The former has many shortcomings, such as noisy data, inter-class similarity, intra-class variability, spoofing and universality, which reduce the system’s accuracy. The success rate of recognition and verification is, however, substantially improved by multimodal biometric sensing and processing systems, which leverage the detection or processing of two or more behavioral or physiological traits.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Al Rousan, M. & Intrigila, B. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of Biometrics Types: Literature Review. Journal of Computer Science, 16(12), 1778–1788. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.1778.1788
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 16, Issue 12
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
