Forecasting Air Passenger Demand: A Comparison of LSTM and SARIMA
Quang Hung Do1, Shih-Kuei Lo2, Jeng-Fung Chen2, Chi-Luan Le1 & Luong Hoang Anh1 Show affiliations
- University of Transport Technology, Vietnam
- Feng Chia University, Taiwan
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 16, Issue 7, pp. 1063–1084 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.1063.1084
Abstract
All airports need to have an accurate prediction of the number of passengers for their efficient management. An accurate prediction of the number of air passengers is crucial task since it provides information for planning decisions in the airport infrastructure to stabilize the service and maximize the profit. This study proposes a novel air passenger demand forecasting model based on Deep Neural Network (DNN), specifically, Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) algorithm. The developed models are applied on the data from Incheon International Airport to show its effectiveness and practicability. The Seasonal Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) method is also applied to the research problem. The performance criteria including MAPE, MSE, RMSE and MAD are used to evaluate the forecasting accuracy. The experimental results show that both SARIMA and LSTM approaches provide accurate and reliable forecasting and have greater predictive capability; however, the LSTM model shows a superior forecasting performance.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Do, Q. H., Lo, S., Chen, J., Le, C. & Anh, L. H. (2020). Forecasting Air Passenger Demand: A Comparison of LSTM and SARIMA. Journal of Computer Science, 16(7), 1063–1084. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.1063.1084
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 16, Issue 7
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
