Integrating Lowest Priority Approach with Largest Point Scheme for Faster Feasibility Analysis
Nasro Min-Allah1 Show affiliations
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp. 550–557 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2019.550.557
Abstract
Recently many solutions have been proposed to lower the computational cost of feasibility analysis for real-time systems. The computational cost of feasibility tests can be lowered by strategies such as lowering the number of scheduling points needed during analysis, starting feasibility analysis from lowest priority, or starting schedulability tests for a task with larger scheduling point. All these techniques significantly reduce the computation time of feasibility analysis for fixed priority systems. The computation time of such tests can be further reduced by combining various solutions for efficient feasibility analysis of periodic task sets. In this work, we integrate both lowest priority first with largest points first solution to derive a faster feasibility analysis test for fixed priority system. Our experimental evaluations suggest that the proposed technique significantly lowers the computational cost of the test when system utilization is in the range of 80% or when the ratio between the task period of a lower priority task and the highest priority task is large.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Min-Allah, N. (2019). Integrating Lowest Priority Approach with Largest Point Scheme for Faster Feasibility Analysis. Journal of Computer Science, 15(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2019.550.557
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 15, Issue 4
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
