Sign inSubmit
computersciencejournal.org is not ours. This journal is published only at thescipub.com/jcs. Report a suspicious emailcomputersciencejournal.org is not ours · Report
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 5 October 2018

Comparative Analysis of Interaction Flow Modeling Language Tools

Naziha Laaz1, Karzan Wakil2, Samir Mbarki1 & Dayang N.A. Jawawi3

Journal of Computer Science, Volume 14, Issue 9, pp. 1267–1278 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2018.1267.1278

7,633 accesses5,748 downloads7 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Modeling approaches based on standards are of paramount importance in the field of front-end design for web and mobile applications. Problems are often encountered during the selection of tools for designing applications for developers and researchers, particularly applications that are related to time and cost in the market and academia. The Interaction Flow Modeling Language (IFML) is a recently standardized modeling language designed for managing the content expression, user interaction and behavior control of front-end applications. IFML brings several benefits to the development process of web and mobile front-end applications. Thus, several tools have been developed for the exploitation of technical artifacts offered by current specifications. In this study, we discuss the tools proposed for modeling IFML to provide a comparative analysis while considering various criteria. The result can be used as a basis of tool selection for specific aspects.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Laaz, N., Wakil, K., Mbarki, S. & Jawawi, D. N. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Interaction Flow Modeling Language Tools. Journal of Computer Science, 14(9), 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2018.1267.1278

Licence
CC BY 3.0
Issue
Volume 14, Issue 9
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Comparative Analysis of Interaction Flow Modeling Language ToolsJournal of Computer Science · Volume 14, Issue 9 · pp. 1267–1278 · CC BY 3.0Download