A Comparison Study between Different Sampling Strategies for Intrusion Detection System of Active Learning Model
Ghofran Mohammad Alqaralleh1, Mohammad Aref Alshraideh1 & Ali Alrodan1 Show affiliations
- the University of Jordan, Jordan
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 14, Issue 8, pp. 1155–1173 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2018.1155.1173
Abstract
Active learning aims to train an accurate model with minimum cost by labeling the most informative instances without compromising the model performance. So, choosing an efficient criterion for instance selection is the most important step. Sampling stage is the main issue in active learning for many problems such as intrusion detection system. There are many methods for sampling stage to select the informative instances, but what the method should be used to provide the most accurate to the Intrusion Detection System (IDS). So, we made a comparison between three of these methods, uncertainty sampling, Query By Committee (QBC) and expected model change. The contribution of this study is analyzing and examining three of common strategies that used to select the most informative instances to determine the best one of them. The experimental result showed that the expected model change method achieved the highest accuracy compared with uncertainty sampling and query by committee methods.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Alqaralleh, G. M., Alshraideh, M. A. & Alrodan, A. (2018). A Comparison Study between Different Sampling Strategies for Intrusion Detection System of Active Learning Model. Journal of Computer Science, 14(8), 1155–1173. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2018.1155.1173
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 14, Issue 8
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
