A Proposed Framework for Outsourcing and Secure Encrypted Data on OpenStack Object Storage (Swift)
Hala Albaroodi1, Selvakumar Manickam1 & Mohammed Anbar1 Show affiliations
- Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp. 590–597 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2015.590.597
Abstract
Despite the numerous potential benefits of Open Source Cloud Computing (OSCC) in several industrial and academic-oriented environments, OSCC could be also associated with some risks. However, which a proper awareness to the cloud consumers or organisations, these risks can be clearly identify and avoided. OpenStack Swift security can provide a greater understanding of how OpenStack Swift functions and what types of security issues arise therein. In this study, a lightweight and robust cloud-based security model for OpenStack object storage within a cloud computing environment is proposed. Swift is a multi-user based model in which every owner encrypts her/his files; each owner uses different levels of cryptographic security. A reduction in the key distribution complexity in this diverse model with a variety of security based settings is critical. Note that proposed model incorporates cryptographic algorithms at the first level (authentication/authorisation) and a hash function to introduce a more secure access method for authentication and authorisation.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Albaroodi, H., Manickam, S. & Anbar, M. (2015). A Proposed Framework for Outsourcing and Secure Encrypted Data on OpenStack Object Storage (Swift). Journal of Computer Science, 11(3), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2015.590.597
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 11, Issue 3
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
