A COMPARISON OF STEPWISE AND FUZZY MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE PROJECT RISKS: ANALYSIS PHASE
Abdelrafe Elzamly1 & Burairah Hussin2 Show affiliations
- Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Malaysia
- Al-Aqsa University, Palestinian Authority
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 10, Issue 9, pp. 1725–1742 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2014.1725.1742
Abstract
Risk is not always avoidable, but it is controllable. The aim of this study is to identify whether those techniques are effective in reducing software failure. This motivates the authors to continue the effort to enrich the managing software project risks with consider mining and quantitative approach with large data set. In this study, two new techniques are introduced namely stepwise multiple regression analysis and fuzzy multiple regression to manage the software risks. Two evaluation procedures such as MMRE and Pred (25) is used to compare the accuracy of techniques. The model’s accuracy slightly improves in stepwise multiple regression rather than fuzzy multiple regression. This study will guide software managers to apply software risk management practices with real world software development organizations and verify the effectiveness of the new techniques and approaches on a software project. The study has been conducted on a group of software project using survey questionnaire. It is hope that this will enable software managers improve their decision to increase the probability of software project success.
Licence and reuse
Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2014 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Elzamly, A. & Hussin, B. (2014). A COMPARISON OF STEPWISE AND FUZZY MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE PROJECT RISKS: ANALYSIS PHASE. Journal of Computer Science, 10(9), 1725–1742. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2014.1725.1742
- Licence
- © Science Publications
- Issue
- Volume 10, Issue 9
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
