Stateless Aggregate Fair Marking Scheduler for Differentiated Service Networks
Nandhini Sivasubramaniam1 & Palaniammal Senniappan2 Show affiliations
- Bangalore University, India
- Anna University, India
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 63–73 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2013.63.73
Abstract
In diffserv networks, as the traffic flows vary constantly, it is very difficult to maintain the per-flow state. The computation of rate information of the traffic flow also becomes complex. In this study, we propose a Stateless Aggregate Fair Marking (SAMQ) with Multiple Queue Priority Scheduler for Differentiated Service (DiffServ) networks. Initially, priority scheduler is applied to the flows entering the ingress edge router. If it is real time flow like Voice over IP (VoIP) or Video, then the packets are given higher priority else lower priority. In core router, for higher priority flows the Multiple Queue Fair Queuing (MQFQ) is applied that allows a flow to utilize multiple queues to transmit the packets. In case of lower priority, Stateless Aggregate Fair Marking technique is utilized. This technique applies Core Stateless Fair Queuing (CSFQ) technique for maintaining the rate information of packet flow and distributes the token to each incoming packet without maintaining the per-flow state. By simulation results, we show that this technique improves the throughput of non-real time flows.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Sivasubramaniam, N. & Senniappan, P. (2013). Stateless Aggregate Fair Marking Scheduler for Differentiated Service Networks. Journal of Computer Science, 9(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2013.63.73
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 9, Issue 1
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
