Sign inSubmit
computersciencejournal.org is not ours. This journal is published only at thescipub.com/jcs. Report a suspicious emailcomputersciencejournal.org is not ours · Report
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 18 September 2013

A COMPARISION OF VARIOUS EDGE DETECTION TECHNIQUES IN MOTION PICTURE FOR IDENTIFYING A SHARK FISH

Shrivakshan Gopal Thiruvangadan1 & Chelliah Chandrasekar2

Journal of Computer Science, Volume 9, Issue 11, pp. 1427–1434 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2013.1427.1434

6,691 accesses5,298 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

The significant feature of detecting the motion image objects in this study it try identify the shark fish videos by removing the Background of the image. The main method involved in the detecting from the background is the foreground detection of the image. There are many techniques which usually ignore the fact that the background images consist of different image objects whose conditions may mostly change occur. In this study, a motion picture identification procedure is proposed for real time motion video frames by comparing the three key classes of methods for motion detection primarily the Background Removal (Subtraction) followed by the Temporal distinguishing (differencing) and Optical Flow method. Structured hierarchical background procedure is proposed based on segmenting background images objects. It mainly divided the background images divided into several parts (regions) by the Support Vector Machine (SVM) followed by a structured hierarchical model is built with the region procedure and pixel model procedure. In the region model method, the image object is extracted from the histogram of specific parts which is same to the kind of a Gaussian-combination model. In the pixel model procedure, it is been demonstrated by histograms, picture, which shows gradients sample of pixels in each parts based on the concurrent occurrence of object variations. In this study, it suggests Silhouette detection procedure and it is used. The experimental result are counter validated with a video database to illustrate its efficiencies, which is involved, from static to dynamic scenes by analyzing it with some distinguished motion detection methods chiefly Temporal differencing method followed by Optical Flow method and based on the outputs a motion detection procedure for real time video frames can be created which is cost effective, it shows good rate of accuracy, which is less rate of reliability in simple, less of complexity and well adapted to several kinds of shadow (image) distribution.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2013 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Thiruvangadan, S. G. & Chandrasekar, C. (2013). A COMPARISION OF VARIOUS EDGE DETECTION TECHNIQUES IN MOTION PICTURE FOR IDENTIFYING A SHARK FISH. Journal of Computer Science, 9(11), 1427–1434. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2013.1427.1434

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 9, Issue 11
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
A COMPARISION OF VARIOUS EDGE DETECTION TECHNIQUES IN MOTION PICTURE FOR IDENTIFYING A SHARK FISHJournal of Computer Science · Volume 9, Issue 11 · pp. 1427–1434 · © Science PublicationsDownload