Sign inSubmit
computersciencejournal.org is not ours. This journal is published only at thescipub.com/jcs. Report a suspicious emailcomputersciencejournal.org is not ours · Report
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 7 July 2012

Comparative Study of Performance in Cryptography Algorithms (Blowfish and Skipjack)

Ali Ahmad Milad1, Hjh Zaiton Muda2, Zul Azri Bin Muhamad Noh1 & Mustafa Almahdi Algaet1

Journal of Computer Science, Volume 8, Issue 7, pp. 1191–1197 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2012.1191.1197

8,018 accesses6,624 downloads8 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: The main goal guiding the design of any encryption algorithm needs to be secured against unauthorized attacks. For all applied applications, performance and the cost of implementations are also important concerns. A data encryption algorithm would not be of much use if it is secure enough but slow in performance because it is a common repetition to embed encryption algorithms in other applications such as e-commerce, banking and online transaction processing applications. Inserting of encryption algorithms in other applications also prevents a hardware implementation and is thus a major cause of tainted overall performance of the system. Approach: In this study, the performance of the two of the popular secret key encryption algorithms (Blowfish and Skipjack) was compared. Results: Blowfish and Skipjack, had been implemented and their performance was compared by encrypting input files of varying contents and sizes. The algorithms had been implemented in a uniform language C#, using their standard specifications to allow a fair comparison of execution speeds. Conclusion: The performance results have been summarized and a conclusion has been presented. Based on the experiments, we can conclude that the Blowfish is the best performing algorithm for implementation.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2012 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Milad, A. A., Muda, H. Z., Noh, Z. A. B. M. & Algaet, M. A. (2012). Comparative Study of Performance in Cryptography Algorithms (Blowfish and Skipjack). Journal of Computer Science, 8(7), 1191–1197. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2012.1191.1197

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 8, Issue 7
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Comparative Study of Performance in Cryptography Algorithms (Blowfish and Skipjack)Journal of Computer Science · Volume 8, Issue 7 · pp. 1191–1197 · © Science PublicationsDownload