Clinical Assessment of Watermarked Medical Images
Jasni Mohamad Zain, Abdul Rani M. Fauzi & Azian A. Aziz
Journal of Computer Science, Volume 5, Issue 11, pp. 857–863 · doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2009.857.863
Abstract
Problem statement: Digital watermarking provides security to medical images. Watermarking in Region Of Interest (ROI) however distorts medical images but it is known that the resulting loss of fidelity is visually imperceptible. Approach: Clinical assessment will objectively evaluate the distortion on medical images to see whether or not medical diagnosis is altered. We used 75 medical images consisting of x-rays, ultrasound and CT scans. Digital watermarking was inserted in ROI and ROI/Region Of Non Interest (RONI) in all of them. Three assessors were randomly assigned 225 images, each receiving 75, a mixture of watermarked and non watermarked images. Results: Chi square test was used and p<0.05 was considered significant. There was no significant difference between original images and those watermarked in ROI or ROI/RONI. There was no comment on image quality in all the images assessed. Conclusion/Recommendations: Digital watermarking does not alter medical diagnosis when assessed by clinical radiologists. The quality of the watermarked images was also unchanged.
Licence and reuse
Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2009 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Zain, J. M., Fauzi, A. R. M. & Aziz, A. A. (2009). Clinical Assessment of Watermarked Medical Images. Journal of Computer Science, 5(11), 857–863. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2009.857.863
- Licence
- © Science Publications
- Issue
- Volume 5, Issue 11
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
