Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 9 November 2015

Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC): Cross Cultural Perspectives

Patricia Leahy-Warren1, Elizabeth Weathers1, Marina Lupari2, Sadie Campbell2, Roger Clarnette3, Francesc Orfila4, Christine Fitzgerald1, Constança Paúl5, Eileen O’Herlihy1, Nicola Cornally1, Rónán O’Caoimh6, Mary Rose Day1, Helen Mulcahy1 & William Molloy1

International Journal of Research in Nursing, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp. 42–50 · doi.org/10.3844/ijrnsp.2015.42.50

7,441 accesses4,264 downloads3 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Older people are at an increased risk of developing multiple co-morbidities causing subsequent cognitive, functional decline and frailty and increasing the risk of adverse healthcare outcomes. Public Health Nurses (PHNs), geriatricians and researchers developed the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC) to record the presence of problems, severity (mild, moderate, severe) of concerns and caregiver networks' ability to manage the patient across three domains: mental state, activities of daily living and medical state. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of healthcare professionals who had used the RISC with community-dwelling older adults, between countries. Five focus groups (n = 28) were conducted in five countries (Australia, Northern Ireland, Portugal, Republic of Ireland and Spain). Four main themes were identified from participants' experiences using the RISC: 'Tool Usability'; 'Benefits for Patients and Carers'; 'Operational Challenges'; and 'Recommendations for Improvement'. Some cultural differences were found between participants with regards to terminologies such as 'caregiver network' and 'insight' and expectation in relation to caring. Disciplinary differences were identified related to different conceptualisations of health. The RISC offers an innovative approach to identify and score risk in community dwelling older adults. However, further research is necessary to reflect cultural and disciplinary norms.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Leahy-Warren, P., Weathers, E., Lupari, M., Campbell, S., Clarnette, R., Orfila, F., Fitzgerald, C., Paúl, C., O’Herlihy, E., Cornally, N., O’Caoimh, R., Day, M. R., Mulcahy, H. & Molloy, W. (2015). Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC): Cross Cultural Perspectives. International Journal of Research in Nursing, 6(2), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.3844/ijrnsp.2015.42.50

Licence
CC BY 3.0
Issue
Volume 6, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC): Cross Cultural PerspectivesInternational Journal of Research in Nursing · Volume 6, Issue 2 · pp. 42–50 · CC BY 3.0Download