Sign inSubmit
ArticleArticle metrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 11 January 2017

What is Missing in STD Screening in Hong Kong?

Clement Leung-Kwok Chan1, Wai Yee Chan2, Christopher Hon Ki Cheng2 & Ping Xia3

Current Research in Medicine, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 13–18 · doi.org/10.3844/amjsp.2016.13.18

8,407 accesses4,643 downloads1 citations (Crossref)Journal metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

This retrospective analysis was to study the prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) in a Reproductive Medical Center in Hong Kong. A total of 1190 patients were included in this study. Group 1A, couples had no symptoms but presented with subinfertility; Group 1B, the subfertile couples were positive for either Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) or Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU); Group 2, couples with symptoms were offered full STD screening including CT, UU, Mycoplasma hominis (MH), Neisseria gonorrhoea (NG), Syphilis, Herpes Simplex Virus 1 and 2. The methods of ELISA and quantitative real-time PCR were used for these analyses. Group 1A: UU detection rates in both male and female (13.84 v.s. 37.07%) were significantly higher than that of CT (5.65 v.s. 5.57%); Group 1B and Group 2: For those who had Full STD check, UU and MH detection rates were significantly higher than that of CT (35, 13.7 and 7.1% respectively). Over 47% of patients showed positive for one or more organism. In the subfertile couples, the UU and CT detection rates were much higher in females than those in males. Both semen and urine samples gave the same rates of infection among CT, UU, NG and MH. U. urealyticum infection rate rather than Chlamydis trachomatis infection is highest in Hong Kong. The infection rate in females is higher than in males. The detection rates in semen and urine samples in males are similar.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, C. L., Chan, W. Y., Cheng, C. H. K. & Xia, P. (2016). What is Missing in STD Screening in Hong Kong?. Current Research in Medicine, 7(2), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.3844/amjsp.2016.13.18

Licence
CC BY 3.0
Issue
Volume 7, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
What is Missing in STD Screening in Hong Kong?Current Research in Medicine · Volume 7, Issue 2 · pp. 13–18 · CC BY 3.0Download