Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 4 September 2024

Bacterial Resistance in Primary Bloodstream Infections in the COVID-19 Pandemic: What has Changed at a Reference Hospital in Northeastern Brazil?

Jonathan Da Silva Xavier1, Jorge Luiz Nobre Rodrigues1, Caroline Mary Gurgel Dias Florêncio1, Evelyne Santana Girão2, Licia Borges Pontes2, Alyne Mara Rodrigues De Carvalho3, Pablo Eliack Linhares De Holanda1,2, Samuel Arruda Rodrigues Pereira4 & Terezinha Do Menino Jesus Silva Leitão1

American Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp. 24–34 · doi.org/10.3844/ajidsp.2024.24.34

5,033 accesses2,515 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

The increased use of central venous catheters due to the severity of COVID-19 cases and the difficulty in implementing preventive Healthcare-Associated Infection measures contributed to worsening an already challenging scenario of bacterial resistance. Characterizing the impact of these significant health crises on the bacterial resistance profile is necessary to strengthen antimicrobial control protocols in an effort to decrease morbidity. Our main goal was to investigate changes in the bacterial resistance profile in patients with Primary Bloodstream Infections (PBSIs) receiving care at the intensive care unit of a reference hospital in Ceará (northeastern Brazil) during the COVID-19 pandemic. PBSI registries from the hospital infection control service, dating from 2018-2021, and medical records were reviewed. A 5% significance level and a 95% confidence interval were adopted in all inferential procedures. Ninety-four bacterial isolates from blood cultures were studied (29 from the pre-pandemic period and 65 from the pandemic period). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently identified bacterium in the pre-pandemic period (20.68%), while Klebsiella pneumoniae was most commonly found during the pandemic (24.61%). The mean antibiotic resistance per bacterium was 4.8 (SD = 3.4) in the pre-pandemic period, increasing to 7 (SD = 4.1) during the pandemic. Penicillins (96%, n = 28) and second-generation cephalosporins (57.1%, n = 28), the most frequent antibiotic classes with resistance in the pre-pandemic era, gave way to carbapenems (115.5%, n = 65) and third-generation cephalosporins (86.1%, n = 65) during the pandemic period. No statistical difference was observed in the number of central venous catheter insertions (p = 0.96). However, more deaths were recorded during the pandemic period (p = 0.014). The antimicrobial resistance profiles increased during the pandemic, including resistance to more selectively used antibacterials.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Xavier, J. D. S., Rodrigues, J. L. N., Florêncio, C. M. G. D., Girão, E. S., Pontes, L. B., De Carvalho, A. M. R., De Holanda, P. E. L., Pereira, S. A. R. & Leitão, T. D. M. J. S. (2024). Bacterial Resistance in Primary Bloodstream Infections in the COVID-19 Pandemic: What has Changed at a Reference Hospital in Northeastern Brazil?. American Journal of Infectious Diseases, 20(2), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajidsp.2024.24.34

Licence
CC BY 4.0
Issue
Volume 20, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Bacterial Resistance in Primary Bloodstream Infections in the COVID-19 Pandemic: What has Changed at a Reference Hospital in Northeastern Brazil?American Journal of Infectious Diseases · Volume 20, Issue 2 · pp. 24–34 · CC BY 4.0Download