Evaluation of A Rapid IgM-IgG Combined Antibody Test for SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Single Italian Center Study
Katia Margiotti1, Marina Cupellaro1, Sabrina Emili1, Alvaro Mesoraca1 & Claudio Giorlandino2 Show affiliations
- Altamedica Main Centre, Italy
- Fetal-Maternal Medical Centre, Italy
American Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp. 85–88 · doi.org/10.3844/ajidsp.2020.85.88
Abstract
The need for timely establishment of diagnostic assays of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is demanded in laboratories worldwide. We evaluated the performance of a flow immunoassay which can detect IgM an IgG antibodies simultaneously against SARS-CoV-2 virus in human blood within 15 min. Among the 132 positive novel Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) cases, 126 tests were consistent with previous quantitative Real Time PCR (qRT-PCR) assays. Among the 62 negative cases, 60 were consistent with qRT-PCR assays except for 2 cases. In this study, 2019-nCOV/COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device showed 95.5% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity. In conclusion, Rapid IgM-IgG Combined Antibody Test showed high detection consistency among all analysed samples. Suggesting that could be used for the rapid screening of SARS-CoV-2 carriers, either symptomatic or asymptomatic.
Licence and reuse
Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Margiotti, K., Cupellaro, M., Emili, S., Mesoraca, A. & Giorlandino, C. (2020). Evaluation of A Rapid IgM-IgG Combined Antibody Test for SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Single Italian Center Study. American Journal of Infectious Diseases, 16(2), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajidsp.2020.85.88
- Licence
- CC BY 3.0
- Issue
- Volume 16, Issue 2
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
