Sign inSubmit
ArticleArticle metrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 24 August 2020

Why Continue Studying HRP2 and HRP3 in Malaria?

María Luz Gunturiz1, Pablo Enrique Chaparro1, Gabriel Carrasquilla2 & Mónica Marcela Jiménez2

American Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp. 120–130 · doi.org/10.3844/ajidsp.2020.120.130

6,897 accesses3,831 downloads0 citations (Crossref)Journal metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

The main malaria control strategy is rapid and accurate diagnosis followed by effective treatment. The quality of the diagnosis is relevant, since an erroneous diagnosis can generate an increase in morbidity and mortality significantly. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that all patients with suspected malaria be diagnosed by microscopy or a Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) before treatment. Microscopy and RDT are the main options for diagnosing malaria in the field and in remote areas of endemic countries. This is in line with pillar 1 of the elimination strategy "Achieve universal access to malaria prevention, diagnosis and treatment". Most of the RDTs available on the market detect an antigen from the parasite produced throughout the life cycle of P. falciparum; this corresponds to the Histidine-Rich Protein 2 (HRP2). In general, HRP2-based RDTs are more sensitive and stable than those based on other Plasmodium antigens, making them the best choice in most endemic countries where P. falciparum malaria predominates. In this review we present evidence on the genetic variability of PfHRP2 and 3 and its potential effect on the efficacy of rapid tests routinely used to diagnose malaria and as main methodological tool elimination programs worldwide.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Gunturiz, M. L., Chaparro, P. E., Carrasquilla, G. & Jiménez, M. M. (2020). Why Continue Studying HRP2 and HRP3 in Malaria?. American Journal of Infectious Diseases, 16(3), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajidsp.2020.120.130

Licence
CC BY 3.0
Issue
Volume 16, Issue 3
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Why Continue Studying HRP2 and HRP3 in Malaria?American Journal of Infectious Diseases · Volume 16, Issue 3 · pp. 120–130 · CC BY 3.0Download