Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Open access · Published 28 March 2016

Comparison of Stochastic and Deterministic Methods for Mapping Environmental Noise from Opencast Quarries

Dario Lippiello1, Guido Alfaro Degan1 & Mario Pinzari1

American Journal of Environmental Sciences, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp. 68–76 · doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2016.68.76

7,394 accesses6,039 downloads2 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

An accurate mapping of the acoustic spatial variability generated by quarrying plants constitutes an important step in the assessment of the environmental compatibility of the extraction site with the surrounding area. This paper refers to the results of a study comparing performances obtained by stochastic and deterministic methods to determine the acoustic climate of the areas surrounding opencast quarries. To this aim noise levels are monitored in the areas surrounding a limestone quarry site in central Italy. In the first phase an analytical prediction model, based on ISO 9613 and ISO 3746, is developed using the sampled sound power level of each source as input data. In the second phase, in contrast, the stochastic method of Ordinary Kriging is used to plot an acoustic map. This is drawn up by interpolating the scattered sound pressure level data from sampled points which are identified as nodes of a rectangular grid covering the chosen area. The analytical prediction model output, which consists in the sound pressure level at various target points, is then compared with the homologous map obtained from the Ordinary Kriging method. Finally the resulting maps are evaluated with respect to statistical measures and cross validation procedures in order to determine the most suitable method.

Licence and reuse

Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence (CC BY 3.0), as printed on the article, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and the source. No permission is needed.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Lippiello, D., Degan, G. A. & Pinzari, M. (2016). Comparison of Stochastic and Deterministic Methods for Mapping Environmental Noise from Opencast Quarries. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 12(2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2016.68.76

Licence
CC BY 3.0
Issue
Volume 12, Issue 2
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Comparison of Stochastic and Deterministic Methods for Mapping Environmental Noise from Opencast QuarriesAmerican Journal of Environmental Sciences · Volume 12, Issue 2 · pp. 68–76 · CC BY 3.0Download