Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 2 November 2011

Remediation Technologies for Marine Oil Spills: A Critical Review and Comparative Analysis

D. Dave & A.E. Ghaly

American Journal of Environmental Sciences, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp. 423–440 · doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2011.423.440

25,601 accesses22,757 downloads221 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: Anthropogenic activities pollute the oceans with oil through land run off, vessels accidents, periodic tanker discharges and bilge discharges. Oil spills are environmental disasters that impact human, plants and wild life including birds, fish and mammals. Approach: In this study, the International Guidelines for Preventing Oils Spills and Response to Disasters were reviewed and the characteristics of oil spills were discussed. The advantages and disadvantages of various oil spill response methods were evaluated. A comparative analysis were performed on the currently available remediation technologies using 10 evaluation criteria that included cost, efficiency, time, impact on wild life, reliability, level of difficulty, oil recovery, weather, effect on physical/chemical characteristics of oil and the need for further treatment. The advantages and disadvantages of each response method were used to determine the score assigned to that method. Results: There are many government regualtions for individual countries that serve as prevention mesures for oil spills in the offshore environment. They have to do with the design of equipment and machinery used in the offshore environment and performing the necessary safety inspections. The primary objectives of response to oil spill are: to prevent the spill from moving onto shore, reduce the impact on marine life and speed the degradation of any unrecovered oil. There are several physical, chemical, thermal and biological remediation technologies for oil spills including booms, skimmers, sorbents, dispersants, in-situ burning and bioremediation. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages and the choice of a particular technique will depend on: type of oil, physical, biological and economical characteristics of the spill, location, weather and sea conditions, amount spilled and rate of spillage, depth of water column, time of the year and effectiveness of technique. Coclusion: Based on the comparative analysis, oil recovery with mechanical methods and the application of dispersants followed by bioremediation is the most effective response for marine oil spill.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2011 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Dave, D. & Ghaly, A. (2011). Remediation Technologies for Marine Oil Spills: A Critical Review and Comparative Analysis. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 7(5), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2011.423.440

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 7, Issue 5
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Remediation Technologies for Marine Oil Spills: A Critical Review and Comparative AnalysisAmerican Journal of Environmental Sciences · Volume 7, Issue 5 · pp. 423–440 · © Science PublicationsDownload