Sign inSubmit
ArticleMetrics
Research Article · Free to read · Published 31 December 2009

Ozone Treatment of Animal Manure for Odor Control

Fahad Nasser Alkoaik

American Journal of Environmental Sciences, Volume 5, Issue 6, pp. 765–771 · doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2009.765.771

7,311 accesses7,183 downloads8 citations (Crossref)Metrics
Cite Check for updates

Abstract

Problem statement: The effectiveness of ozone in reducing odor emission from liquid animal manure was evaluated under batch and continuous treatment operations. Results: The results indicated that the use of ozone for the treatment of animal manure proved to be effective in reducing the odor offensiveness. A minimum 3.4 level out of 10 (66% reduction) was achieved in the continuous operation; while a minimum of 3.1 (69% reduction) was achieved in the batch operation. Increasing the level of ozone (O3) increased the level of offensiveness which was attributed to the presence of intermediate products due to the interaction between ozone and hydrogen sulfide and methylamine. Conclusion: The cost analysis indicated that the treatment is economical as a ton of manure could be treated at a cost of $ 0.23.

Licence and reuse

Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2009 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.

How to reuse this article

Responses (0)

Have a comment on this research? Sign in to respond. Responses are moderated and published with your name and affiliation; the authors are invited to reply. How we use your dataWrite a response

About this article

Cite this article

Alkoaik, F. N. (2009). Ozone Treatment of Animal Manure for Odor Control. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 5(6), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2009.765.771

Licence
© Science Publications
Issue
Volume 5, Issue 6
Policies
Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
Version
Version of record
Ozone Treatment of Animal Manure for Odor ControlAmerican Journal of Environmental Sciences · Volume 5, Issue 6 · pp. 765–771 · © Science PublicationsDownload