A Study on Suction-rainfall Response of a Cut Slope in Unsaturated Residual Soil Using a Field Rain Simulator
Bujang B.K. Huat, Faisal Hj. Ali & S. Mariappan
American Journal of Environmental Sciences, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp. 11–15 · doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2005.11.15
Abstract
This research describes the design and construction of an artificial rain simulator system and the results obtained with regards to suction-rainfall response of a cut slope in unsaturated residual soil of weathered sandstone of various weathering grades. From the field measurements, the shallow tensiometers are found to record an immediate initial increase in matric suction within the first 20 min of the simulated rain before a gradual drop in suction takes place. However no such initial spikes in suction readings were recorded by the deeper tensiometers. With constant rainfall for the next 130 min, a clear drop in soil suction was observed in all cases illustrating the effect of net infiltration process. Positive pore water pressure was even recorded by some of the deeper tensiometers. The suction recorded by the shallow tensiometers was always higher than those of the deeper tensiometers, indicating a reduction in suction with depth below the ground surface. In term of weathering grades, residual soil of weathered sandstone of weathering grade III has the highest infiltration rate indicating the more porous nature of this soil material. Like wise there is a steeper drop in suction during the rain at the said location.
Licence and reuse
Free to read. This article carries the publisher’s copyright, as printed on it: © 2005 Science Publications. It is free to read; ask us before reusing it.
How to reuse this articleResponses (0)
About this article
Huat, B. B., Ali, F. H. & Mariappan, S. (2005). A Study on Suction-rainfall Response of a Cut Slope in Unsaturated Residual Soil Using a Field Rain Simulator. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2005.11.15
- Licence
- © Science Publications
- Issue
- Volume 1, Issue 1
- Policies
- Editorial independenceUse of generative AIData availabilityAppeals and complaints
- Version
- Version of record
